Tim Cook is latest CEO to question the ‘metaverse’


While Meta funnels billions into CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s pitch for the metaverse, Apple CEO Tim Cook thinks most people couldn’t even define the metaverse, let alone spend long periods of time living their lives inside of it.

“I always think it’s important that people understand what something is,” Cook told Dutch publication Bright (via Google Translate). “And I’m really not sure the average person can tell you what the metaverse is.” In other words, despite persistent reports of Apple’s interest in building all manner of AR and VR hardware, Cook isn’t ready to claim that the company is working towards any so-called “metaverse.”

Mark Zuckerberg has a different view. Earlier this year, the Meta CEO told his employees that the company is in a “very deep, philosophical competition” with Apple to build the metaverse. “This is a competition of philosophies and ideas, where they believe that by doing everything themselves and tightly integrating that they build a better consumer experience,” Zuckerberg said, contrasting what he says is Apple’s closed approach with Meta’s more interoperable development. 

“I’m really not sure the average person can tell you what the metaverse is”

Cook also expressed skepticism that people will want to spend extended periods of time in VR in the future. “[VR is] something you can really immerse yourself in. And that can be used in a good way. But I don’t think you want to live your whole life that way,” he told Bright. “VR is for set periods, but not a way to communicate well.”

Cook’s comments make him the latest high profile CEO to express skepticism about the metaverse. Snap CEO Evan Spiegel told The Guardian that the company avoids using the term because it’s “pretty ambiguous and hypothetical,” and that if you were to ask a room of people to define it, all their definitions would be ”totally different.” Meanwhile Amazon’s head of devices David Limp recent said that if he asked a “few hundred people what they thought the metaverse was, we’d get 205 different answers” and that there’s no “common definition” of the term.



Source link

Related articles

Use Price Variance Evaluation to Get to the Backside of Runaway Token Spend

So, you’ve blown by way of your AI price range. Be part of the membership. Blaming token consumption might have labored as soon as. However because the adage goes “idiot me as soon...

Secretary of Struggle Hegseth wants extra money for battle

It was once the Secretary of Protection, however the high-T Pete Hegseth - the US Secretary of Struggle - goes to Congress for pressing funds wanted to switch gear misplaced or broken in...

The Human within the Noose: On the Particular Hell of Marking an AI’s Homework

Right here’s a (seeming) paradox: If you happen to hang around with programmers, you most likely know some senior, skilled, gifted coders who're delighted with AI and might’t cease speaking about how they’re...

TradFi Perpetuals Turn into Crypto Exchanges’ Quickest-Rising Section. Bitget Ranks Second Behind Binance

Fintech Training Defined: How Finance Magnates Academy Helps You Construct a Profession Fintech Training Defined: How Finance Magnates Academy...

Magnolia’s $4.06 billion WildFire deal creates main South Texas place

(WO) — Magnolia Oil & Fuel Corp. has agreed to accumulate WildFire Power for about $4.06 billion, making a considerably bigger place throughout the Eagle Ford and Austin Chalk in South Texas and...
spot_img

Latest articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com