Tim Cook is latest CEO to question the ‘metaverse’


While Meta funnels billions into CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s pitch for the metaverse, Apple CEO Tim Cook thinks most people couldn’t even define the metaverse, let alone spend long periods of time living their lives inside of it.

“I always think it’s important that people understand what something is,” Cook told Dutch publication Bright (via Google Translate). “And I’m really not sure the average person can tell you what the metaverse is.” In other words, despite persistent reports of Apple’s interest in building all manner of AR and VR hardware, Cook isn’t ready to claim that the company is working towards any so-called “metaverse.”

Mark Zuckerberg has a different view. Earlier this year, the Meta CEO told his employees that the company is in a “very deep, philosophical competition” with Apple to build the metaverse. “This is a competition of philosophies and ideas, where they believe that by doing everything themselves and tightly integrating that they build a better consumer experience,” Zuckerberg said, contrasting what he says is Apple’s closed approach with Meta’s more interoperable development. 

“I’m really not sure the average person can tell you what the metaverse is”

Cook also expressed skepticism that people will want to spend extended periods of time in VR in the future. “[VR is] something you can really immerse yourself in. And that can be used in a good way. But I don’t think you want to live your whole life that way,” he told Bright. “VR is for set periods, but not a way to communicate well.”

Cook’s comments make him the latest high profile CEO to express skepticism about the metaverse. Snap CEO Evan Spiegel told The Guardian that the company avoids using the term because it’s “pretty ambiguous and hypothetical,” and that if you were to ask a room of people to define it, all their definitions would be ”totally different.” Meanwhile Amazon’s head of devices David Limp recent said that if he asked a “few hundred people what they thought the metaverse was, we’d get 205 different answers” and that there’s no “common definition” of the term.



Source link

Related articles

Iridium Communications Makes A Daring Transfer That Creates Lengthy-Time period Progress (NASDAQ:IRDM)

This text was written byComply withDaniel is an avid and lively skilled investor. He runs Crude Worth Insights, a value-oriented publication aimed toward analyzing the money flows and assessing the worth of corporations...

What the jury will truly determine within the case of Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman

9 California jurors at the moment are deliberating over the way forward for OpenAI, the world-leading synthetic intelligence lab. Whereas the trial exploring Elon Musk’s case towards OpenAI’s different cofounders and Microsoft has lined...

Extra from Fed’s Williams, sees no case for price transfer as coverage sits in good place

Fed's Williams stated financial coverage is in a very good place and mildly restrictive, seeing no cause to lift or decrease charges now, whereas flagging sturdy productiveness progress and steady market circumstances.Earlier:Abstract: In line...

Cardano’s Most Correct Indicator Simply Flipped Bullish

Crypto analyst Ali Martinez stated a long-tracked SuperTrend sign on Cardano’s day by day chart has flipped bullish, months after the identical device marked the beginning of a steep decline. The decision comes...

Anthropic and Gates Basis pledge $200M to make use of AI in well being and training initiatives; the muse signed an identical, $50M take...

Featured Podcasts Nice Chat: What does it imply to be mission-driven in 2026? A podcast largely about tech. Delivered to you weekly by Angela Du, Sally Shin, Mac Bohannon, Helen Min, and Ashley Mayer. Subscribe to Nice...
spot_img

Latest articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com