Practically a decade in the past, Tesla launched its photo voltaic roof, which was basically a mini-power plant that occurred to seem like high-end shingles, fancy terra-cotta tiles, or refined slate slabs.
Now the photo voltaic roof is useless. Tesla has scrubbed public-facing mentions of the product from its web site. TechCrunch has confirmed that the photo voltaic roof URL now redirects to its generic photo voltaic touchdown web page on Tesla’s web site, and all the help pages redirect, too. Electrek was first to report on the product’s disappearance.
However like different Tesla initiatives, the idea might need a life past the corporate. Two photo voltaic installers instructed TechCrunch their firm was nonetheless providing the photo voltaic roof, although one mentioned availability would rely on the timeline of the mission. That implies Tesla is working to dump current stock.
Relying on how full that warehouse is, the photo voltaic roof could be accessible for a while. Tesla had lofty objectives for the product, aiming for 1,000 installations per week, however after years of refinement and course of enchancment, the mission obtained to someplace between 20 and 40 per week as of 2022.
Tesla’s photo voltaic roof by no means had a vibrant future. From the beginning, it was positioned as a luxurious product, and it solely obtained dearer over time. In its advertising supplies, Tesla in contrast the photo voltaic roof with the price of photo voltaic, plus roof substitute. That positioning made the product appear engaging, particularly for those who actually didn’t just like the seems of standard photo voltaic panels. However even whenever you factored in substitute, the product may very well be eye-wateringly costly. Individuals reported receiving quotes of $200,000 to put in one.
At the same time as silicon-based expertise obtained cheaper over time, the photo voltaic roof proved an aberration. Common panels dropped in worth as a result of the world makes billions of standardized photo voltaic cells yearly and assembles them into largely standardized panels. The photo voltaic roof might need used customary cells, however the tiles have been distinctive to the system. That meant Tesla needed to design and purchase its personal manufacturing gear, and when gross sales didn’t materialize as anticipated, the per-unit value of that gear went up.
Physics wasn’t variety to the mission, both. Something that’s below full solar publicity has to take care of warmth, and there have been stories of the photo voltaic roof’s non-solar elements warping and roof underlayment melting. For Tesla, maybe extra troubling have been stories of underproduction: The system wasn’t making as a lot electrical energy as Tesla mentioned they’d.
It’s exhausting to say what, precisely, resulted within the underproduction, however a probable offender is warmth. Like many digital units, photo voltaic panels carry out higher once they’re colder. Voltage tends to say no by about half a % for each diploma Celsius. Common photo voltaic panels address this by leaving a spot between the panels and the roof, permitting for some airflow to chill issues off. Tesla did the identical with the photo voltaic roof, however the hole was a lot smaller, which can have led to excessive temperatures that robbed the cells of some effectivity.
So now that Tesla is pushing patrons to its conventional photo voltaic panels, does this spell the top of built-in photo voltaic roofs?
For now, no. Different firms like GAF and Merlin Photo voltaic are nonetheless angling for a chunk of the market. Plus, it’s possible that quite a lot of patrons with particular aesthetic tastes will maintain firms .
Nonetheless, Tesla’s determination might deal a blow to the concept of a photo voltaic roof. If one of many world’s Most worthy firms can’t make it work, who can? Perhaps that’s an indictment of the complete idea. Or possibly it seems like a problem to an keen founder keen to show Elon Musk fallacious.
Once you buy by way of hyperlinks in our articles, we could earn a small fee. This doesn’t have an effect on our editorial independence.
