By Jody Godoy

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -Elon Musk, Tesla (NASDAQ:) Inc’s chief govt, testified on Friday that traders don’t all the time react to his Twitter messages as he expects, defending himself in a fraud trial over his 2018 tweet that he had funding to take the electrical carmaker non-public.

Musk’s testimony started with questions on his use of Twitter, the social media platform he purchased in October. He known as it probably the most democratic option to talk however stated his tweets didn’t all the time have an effect on Tesla inventory the way in which he anticipated.

“Simply because I tweet one thing doesn’t imply individuals consider it or will act accordingly,” Musk informed the jury in San Francisco federal courtroom.

Musk testified for lower than half-hour earlier than courtroom adjourned till Monday and he was not requested about his 2018 tweet that he was contemplating taking Tesla non-public and that he had “funding secured.”

He’s anticipated to deal with why he has insisted he had Saudi investor backing to take Tesla non-public, which by no means occurred, and whether or not he knowingly made a materially deceptive assertion along with his tweet.

The case is a uncommon securities class motion trial and the plaintiffs have already cleared excessive authorized hurdles, with U.S. Choose Edward Chen ruling final 12 months that Musk’s funding put up was untruthful and reckless.

Shareholders alleged that Musk lied when he despatched the tweet, costing traders tens of millions.

Musk, carrying a darkish swimsuit over a white button-down shirt, spoke softly and in a generally bemused method, a distinction to his occasional combative testimony in previous trials.

Musk described the difficulties the corporate went by across the time he despatched the “funding secured” tweet, together with bets by short-sellers that the inventory would fall.

“A bunch of sharks on Wall Avenue wished Tesla to die, very badly,” he stated, describing short-sellers, who revenue when a inventory falls in value.

He stated short-sellers plant false tales and stated the follow must be made unlawful.

Shares of Tesla ended about 5% greater at $133.42.

Earlier on Friday, Tesla investor Timothy Fries informed the jury that he misplaced $5,000 shopping for Tesla inventory after Musk despatched the tweet, which sparked risky swings in Tesla’s inventory.

Fries stated that “funding secured” meant to him that “there had been some vetting, some vital evaluate of these funding sources.”

Musk’s lawyer, Alex Spiro, informed the jury in his opening assertion Wednesday that Musk believed he had financing from Saudi backers and was taking steps to make the deal occur. Fearing leaks to the media, Musk tried to guard the “on a regular basis shareholder” by sending the tweet, which contained “technical inaccuracies,” Spiro stated.

Guhan Subramanian, a Harvard Legislation College professor, informed the jury that Musk’s habits in 2018 was “unprecedented” and “incoherent” by way of structuring a company deal as a result of he went public along with his intent with out correct monetary or authorized evaluation.

A jury of six males and three girls will resolve whether or not the tweet artificially inflated Tesla’s share value by enjoying up the standing of funding for the deal, and if that’s the case, by how a lot.

The defendants embrace present and former Tesla administrators, whom Spiro stated had “pure” motives of their response to Musk’s plan.