Profitability metrics are sometimes the primary focus within the seek for high-quality shares. However Profitability shouldn’t be a defensive issue and should expose buyers to an organization’s aggressive profit-chasing, amongst different unintended dangers.

So, how can such dangers be mitigated? By incorporating a further high quality dimension that we classify as Conservatism. By combining Profitability and Conservatism, we are able to scale back a portfolio’s draw back danger and improve its risk-adjusted returns over the long term.

Profitability Isn’t “Defensive”

Profitability and High quality are sometimes used interchangeably. That’s comprehensible. A number of influential educational research, together with Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French’s five-factor mannequin, characteristic Profitability as an fairness issue. Exterior of academia, nevertheless, High quality has a broader definition that extends past easy Profitability. Thematically, High quality is a “defensive fairness issue” that ought to present draw back safety throughout bear markets.

This raises the query: Does Profitability supply related draw back safety? To reply this, we examined the historic efficiency of varied issue methods utilizing a number of typical business Profitability metrics. These embrace Fama and French’s Revenue, Return on Fairness (ROE), Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), and Return on Belongings (ROA). We sorted and ranked all shares throughout the Russell 1000 universe in line with their Profitability scores after which constructed factor-mimicking portfolios by taking the primary quintile of shares with the best scores and weighting them equally. We rebalanced the issue methods on a month-to-month foundation and calculated their efficiency from January 1979 to June 2022. 

---

Historic Efficiency of the Profitability Issue

	Fama–French Revenue	ROE	ROIC	ROA	Russell 1000
Annualized Return	14.2%	14.2%	14.0%	13.4%	10.1%
Annualized Volatility	17.2%	17.4%	17.1%	17.3%	15.3%
Sharpe Ratio	0.58	0.58	0.57	0.53	0.39
Most Drawdown	–53.6%	–55.3%	–53.0%	–61.6%	–51.1%
Upside Seize Ratio	1.12	1.14	1.12	1.08	–
Draw back Seize Ratio	1.03	1.05	1.03	1.02	–

---

Our evaluation reveals all 4 Profitability methods generated constructive extra returns relative to the Russell 1000. However all of them skilled larger most drawdowns than the benchmark and had a draw back seize ratio over 1. As such, the Profitability methods failed to supply draw back safety. 

The Case for Conservatism

These outcomes exhibit that the profit-centric view of High quality can result in larger draw back danger. Why? As a result of the overemphasis on Profitability encourages companies to tackle extreme leverage and conduct empire-building actions, amongst different profit-chasing pursuits. A worthwhile however extremely levered agency might have larger default or chapter danger when monetary stress will increase amid financial crises. 

Minimizing such dangers requires a multi-dimensional strategy that includes Conservatism into the High quality design. We search for companies with excessive ranges of profitability that additionally exhibit larger monetary conservatism. Which means decrease leverage, stronger stability sheets, extra conservative asset progress, and so forth. 

To exhibit the method, we examined the efficiency of varied Profitability and Conservatism metrics through the International Monetary Disaster in 2008 and the COVID-19 disaster in 2020. The next chart reveals the annualized return spreads between equally weighted prime and backside quintile factor-mimicking portfolios through the market crashes. We discovered that Profitability metrics generated unfavorable return spreads. As an example, ROE, ROIC, and ROA had return spreads of –25% to –37% through the latest COVID disaster. Against this, all Conservatism metrics had constructive return spreads throughout each stress occasions.

---

Profitability vs. Conservatism throughout Crises

---

Subsequent, we demonstrated the defensive attribute of Conservatism with scatter plots and fitted polynomial curves for each Profitability and Profitability Plus Conservatism. The fitted curves illustrate that the convexity of Profitability improved from –0.11 to +0.04 when it was mixed with Conservatism. The constructive convexity, or smile impact, is the defensive characteristic that drives the issue’s outperformance in each up and down markets.

---

Convexity of Issue Returns

---

Lastly, we up to date the primary chart by including our Profitability Plus Conservatism portfolio. We discovered that the composite issue provided significantly better draw back safety and risk-adjusted returns than the extra simplistic Profitability metrics. The Profitability Plus Conservatism portfolio had a decrease most drawdown and better risk-adjusted returns.

---

The Profitability Plus Conservatism Issue

	Fama– French Revenue	ROE	ROIC	ROA	Comp- osite Revenue- potential1	Revenue- potential + Conserv- atism2	Russell 1000
Annualized Return	14.2%	14.2%	14.0%	13.4%	14.1%	15.0%	10.1%
Annualized Volatility	17.2%	17.4%	17.1%	17.3%	16.9%	16.6%	15.3%
Sharpe Ratio	0.58	0.58	0.57	0.53	0.58	0.65	0.39
Most Drawdown	–53.6%	–55.3%	–53.0%	–61.6%	–51.8%	–49.0%	–51.1%
Upside Seize Ratio	1.12	1.14	1.12	1.08	1.10	1.13	–
Draw back Seize Ratio	1.03	1.05	1.03	1.02	1.01	0.99	–

---

Conclusion

Tutorial literature might deal with Profitability and High quality as synonyms, however our analysis reveals they’re removed from analogous. Excessive-Profitability shares can undergo from extreme leverage, aggressive enterprise fashions, and so forth. When crises come, they might not present a lot of a security web.

However Conservatism can add that further dimension to High quality, one that may doubtlessly ship larger risk-adjusted returns.

Additional Studying

Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French. “The Cross-Part of Anticipated Inventory Returns.” The Journal of Finance.

Novy-Marx, Robert. “The Different Facet of Worth: The Gross Profitability Premium.” Journal of Monetary Economics.

Hsu, Jason, Vitali Kalesnik, and Engin Kose. “What Is High quality?” Monetary Analysts Journal.

When you favored this publish, don’t neglect to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.

---

All posts are the opinion of the writer. As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially replicate the views of CFA Institute or the writer’s employer.

Picture credit score: ©Getty Photos/ photonaj

---

Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can document credit simply utilizing their on-line PL tracker.