🔥 Burning Grid — Month-to-month Report · September 2025
September introduced one of many extra technically demanding months of 2025. Markets stayed selective and uneven; nonetheless, two of three profiles completed in revenue and the third closed barely constructive regardless of a number of mechanical finish‑of‑life exits on AUDNZD. That end result shouldn’t be a bug however a core security function of this grid structure: no limitless averaging, strictly outlined exits, and a tough threat price range per technique.
📌 Govt Highlights
-
Excessive Danger: +0.10% ( €+10.04 ) · PF 1.03 · 404 trades · 88% win · 3 AUDNZD methods closed at predefined endpoint with loss
-
Medium Danger: +4.93% ( €+86.12 ) · PF 1.41 · 315 trades · 92% win · 1 technique closed at endpoint with loss
-
Low Danger: +6.98% ( €+123.66 ) · PF 2.86 · 187 trades · 94% win · no closures on endpoints
-
Danger self-discipline: Max DDs contained inside profile expectations (HR 53.58%, MR 33.94%, LR 29.52%)
1) Technique Efficiency — Detailed Breakdown
🔺 Excessive Danger — Construction over hope, and nonetheless inexperienced
What occurred: Three AUDNZD methods (launched in July) reached their predefined endpoint in September and had been closed with losses by design. That is central to Burning Grid’s structure: no infinite place chains—as an alternative, laborious exits as soon as the chance price range is consumed.
Consequence: Even with the mechanical closures and elevated intra‑month DD, Excessive Danger completed barely constructive and preserved structural integrity (PF>1; 88% win fee).
⚖️ Medium Danger — Balanced, resilient, constant
What occurred: One technique closed at endpoint; the remainder of the set remained steady and worthwhile.
Consequence: Internet +4.93% with a wholesome PF and excessive accuracy—nonetheless the greatest threat‑to‑return profile for many customers.
🛡️ Low Danger — The regular compounding engine
What occurred: No methods reached their endpoint; the month ran calm and orderly.
Consequence: A easy fairness line, highest PF among the many three profiles, and no stress occasions—the primary alternative for capital‑preservation setups.
2) Technique Comparability — September 2025
| Technique | Development | Drawdown | Revenue | Win Charge | Revenue Issue | Trades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low Danger | + 6.98 % (prev:+ 9.70 %) | 29.52 % (19.33 %) | €97.49 (€123.66) | 94 % (96 %) | 2.86 (6.54) | 187 (187) |
| Medium Danger | + 4.93 % (prev:+19.17 %) | 33.94 % (30.38 %) | €86.12 (€270.09) | 92 % (96 %) | 1.41 (4.77) | 315 (339) |
| Excessive Danger | + 0.10 % (prev:+23.98 %) | 53.58 % (42.95 %) | €10.04 (€373.10) | 88 % (95 %) | 1.03 (5.77) | 404 (425) |
Endpoint ≠ error. Closing a technique at its endpoint is by design: it enforces the chance price range and prevents “infinite grids.”
3) How Burning Grid manages threat (fast refresher)
-
Fastened grid depth & capped concurrent positions per image
-
No martingale / no exponential lot will increase
-
Capital‑based mostly auto‑lot with laborious exit guidelines (finish‑of‑life technique closures)
-
Occasion filter and selective entry logic to scale back publicity throughout skinny markets
-
100% automation—no discretionary interventions
This framework is why PF stayed ≥ 1 in each profile this month—even with mechanical closures in Excessive and Medium.
4) EA Replace — Model 2.21 (Launched Sep 27, 2025)
A targeted usability & bugfix launch:
New — Dashboard refresh fee
Select how typically the on‑display dashboard updates: Off, On Tick, 1s, 5s, 10s
→ Useful for multi‑EA terminals or decrease‑spec machines.
Bugfix — Auto Mode threat choice
Beforehand, Auto Mode pressured Excessive Danger as soon as steadiness exceeded $10,000, ignoring the chosen profile.
✅ Fastened: Auto Mode now respects the chosen threat degree (Low/Medium/Excessive) no matter account measurement.
📎 Full launch notes (incl. context & notes):
👉 https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/submit/764574
5) Closing ideas
September examined the self-discipline of a grid system. Burning Grid did precisely what it was constructed to do: finish methods at their restrict, defend capital, and preserve buying and selling logic intact. Two profiles posted strong income, and Excessive Danger protected the account via structured exits—ending the month barely constructive.
For skilled deployment, we proceed to suggest €10,000+ per profile, so the total security envelope of the EA can work as designed.
🔗 Sources & References
🛒 Burning Grid on MQL5 Market – https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/135273
📖 All Weblog Articles – https://www.mql5.com/en/customers/mqlcharmant77/weblog
💬 Be part of the Group & Help Group – https://www.mql5.com/en/messages/0151274c579fdb01
🛒 Burning London on MQL5 Market – https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/138938
