Bittrex Fined $53M for Sanctions Violations


Key Takeaways

  • Bittrex has settled with the U.S. Treasury over allegations that it violated OFAC sanctions.
  • The Treasury alleges Bittrex carried out the supposed violations between 2014 and 2017.
  • While the Treasury fine is substantial, a number of mitigating factors were considered.

Share this article

Bittrex has been fined a total of $53 million for sanctions violations. While the Treasury cited the relative smallness of the transactions and Bittrex’s cooperation as mitigating factors, the company is still taking a hit.

Enforcement Action

Bittrex will pay $53 million in fines and penalties for violating U.S. Treasury sanctions as early as 2014.

According to an enforcement release from the Treasury, between March 28, 2014, and December 31, 2017, Bittrex facilitated crypto transactions among sanctioned entities.

“As a result of deficiencies related to Bittrex’s sanctions compliance procedures,” it states, “Bittrex failed to prevent persons apparently located in the Crimea region of Ukraine, Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria from using its platform to engage in approximately $263,451,600.13 worth of virtual currency-related transactions.”

The Treasury further claimed Bittrex’s policies and procedures demonstrated at least a partial awareness of OFAC sanctions as early as August 2015. It further alleges that “based on internet protocol (“IP”) address information and physical address information… Bittrex had reason to know that these users were in jurisdictions subject to sanctions.”

The Treasury also listed several mitigating factors it had taken into consideration in the case, including the fact that it was a relatively new company at the time, that it cooperated substantially with the investigation, and that the offending transactions were relatively small amounts. Potential penalties could have been as high as $465 million if not for these mitigating factors.

Update: This article previously reported a total penalty of $30 million. It has been updated to reflect the most accurate numbers available. 

Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author of this piece owned BTC, ETH, and several other cryptocurrencies.

Share this article



Source link

Related articles

Elon Musk Jokes About ‘Election-Interfering Area Lasers’ as Polymarket Whale Scores on Texas

Key TakeawaysDomer, who trades as ImJustKen, made $62,715 betting towards a Republican win in Texas’ Senate race.He spent about $185,900 on the wager, shopping for “No” shares at a median of 74.6 cents...

Nasdaq sees worst day in 19 months as buyers guess on AI slowdown after Democrats’ election triumph | Nasdaq

The Nasdaq share index had its worst day in 19 months after slumping 5.5% on Thursday amid rising indicators that the substitute intelligence trade will face harder regulation due to the midterm election...

Gate Pioneers Proof of Safety (PoSEC), Reaching 104.58% Chilly Storage Protection to Solidify Asset Safety

Gate has formally launched Proof of Safety (PoSEC), a brand new asset safety verification framework, changing into the primary digital asset buying and selling platform within the trade to launch a PoSEC safety...

Way forward for Sugar Claims: Classes from the Low-Fats Claims Period

Low-fat taught shoppers to mistrust well being claims constructed on compromise. Sugar may very well be subsequent. Manufacturers have spent years taking sugar out. The more durable query is whether or not they have...

The market is ready for indicators from Donald Trump

I spoke to Reuters earlier at present concerning the state of markets and my feedback boiled all the way down to this:"There are two ​paths Trump can go down - he can double...
spot_img

Latest articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com