ASIC Sues BPS for Misleading Promotion of Qoin Tokens


The Australian Securities and Exchange Commission (ASIC) has sued BPS Financial, seeking civil penalties for allegedly making false representations involving Qoin, a crypto asset token, when marketing.

The company further alleged to have engaged in unlicensed conduct to a non-cash payment facility for the cryptocurrency.

BPS established the Qoin Facility in January 2020 as a non-cash payment facility. It included Qoin tokens, a Qoin wallet, and a blockchain -based distributed digital ledger. The tokens were promoted to retail consumers and business owners.

According to ASIC, the misrepresentations include the assurance of exchanging Qoin for other cryptocurrencies or fiat. BPS further claimed that Qoin tokens could be used for purchasing goods and services from registered merchants.

A sister entity of BPS enabled the exchange of Qoin tokens for the Australian dollar, but it imposed increasingly restrictive limits over time.

BPS further claimed that both the token and the associated wallet are regulated in Australia, which ASIC highlighted to be false. Additionally, the misrepresentations include claims of Qoin and BPS to be compliant with financial services laws.

Tough Regulatory Stance

“We allege that, despite what BPS represented in its marketing, Qoin merchant numbers have been declining and that there have been periods of time where it was not possible to exchange Qoin tokens through independent exchanges,” said ASIC’s Deputy Chair, Sarah Court.

“ASIC is particularly concerned about the alleged misrepresentation that the Qoin Facility is regulated in Australia, as we believe the more than 79,000 individuals and entities who have been issued with the Qoin Facility may have believed that it was compliant with financial services laws, when ASIC considers it was not.”

ASIC has been very vigilant against misleading crypto projects lately. It temporarily halted Holon’s three cryptocurrency funds for they not being suitable for retail investors. The regulatory is also earning against potential scams.

“Where it falls within our remit, ASIC will take targeted action against unlicensed conduct and misleading promotion of crypto-asset financial products that could harm consumers – this is a key priority for ASIC. Crypto-assets are highly volatile, inherently risky, and complex,” Court added.

The Australian Securities and Exchange Commission (ASIC) has sued BPS Financial, seeking civil penalties for allegedly making false representations involving Qoin, a crypto asset token, when marketing.

The company further alleged to have engaged in unlicensed conduct to a non-cash payment facility for the cryptocurrency.

BPS established the Qoin Facility in January 2020 as a non-cash payment facility. It included Qoin tokens, a Qoin wallet, and a blockchain -based distributed digital ledger. The tokens were promoted to retail consumers and business owners.

According to ASIC, the misrepresentations include the assurance of exchanging Qoin for other cryptocurrencies or fiat. BPS further claimed that Qoin tokens could be used for purchasing goods and services from registered merchants.

A sister entity of BPS enabled the exchange of Qoin tokens for the Australian dollar, but it imposed increasingly restrictive limits over time.

BPS further claimed that both the token and the associated wallet are regulated in Australia, which ASIC highlighted to be false. Additionally, the misrepresentations include claims of Qoin and BPS to be compliant with financial services laws.

Tough Regulatory Stance

“We allege that, despite what BPS represented in its marketing, Qoin merchant numbers have been declining and that there have been periods of time where it was not possible to exchange Qoin tokens through independent exchanges,” said ASIC’s Deputy Chair, Sarah Court.

“ASIC is particularly concerned about the alleged misrepresentation that the Qoin Facility is regulated in Australia, as we believe the more than 79,000 individuals and entities who have been issued with the Qoin Facility may have believed that it was compliant with financial services laws, when ASIC considers it was not.”

ASIC has been very vigilant against misleading crypto projects lately. It temporarily halted Holon’s three cryptocurrency funds for they not being suitable for retail investors. The regulatory is also earning against potential scams.

“Where it falls within our remit, ASIC will take targeted action against unlicensed conduct and misleading promotion of crypto-asset financial products that could harm consumers – this is a key priority for ASIC. Crypto-assets are highly volatile, inherently risky, and complex,” Court added.



Source link

Related articles

CoinShares Experiences $1.9B in Weekly Crypto Inflows, Ethereum Leads the Pack

Trusted Editorial content material, reviewed by main trade specialists and seasoned editors. Advert Disclosure The digital asset funding area maintained its upward trajectory final week, with inflows into crypto funding merchandise reaching $1.9 billion,...

Harmonic, an AI math startup co-founded by Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev, unveils its mannequin Aristotle, saying it achieved gold medal efficiency on the 2025...

Featured Podcasts Techmeme Journey House: Tea Has Been Spilt The day's tech information, on daily basis at 5pm ET. Fifteen minutes and also you're updated. Subscribe to Techmeme Journey House. Sponsor this podcast Decoder with Nilay Patel: ChatGPT could be...

Overbought Market Meets Rising US Greenback and Tightening Liquidity

Shares completed largely decrease, with the equal-weight Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (NYSE:) down about 60 bps, whereas the market-cap-weighted index closed flat. In the present day kicked off what needs to...

FYNXT Hires StoneX Veteran Camila Pinto as Industrial Director for UK and LATAM

Singapore-based know-how supplier for brokers FYNXT appointed Camila Pinto because the Industrial Director for the UK and LATAM. Pinto is answerable for, amongst different duties, shopper acquisition throughout the areas.“After 15 years in Monetary Companies,...

#9 – “Establishments Cannot Beat A Primary Purchase and Maintain Allocation” – Meb Faber Analysis

Pension funds’ annualized mixture returns since 2000 have been...
spot_img

Latest articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com