After-Birth Abortion – Really? – Investment Watch


by Martin Armstrong

The woman army medic who seems to be fighting for the Constitution clearly has no idea what the Constitution is all about. Here rant which gathered 30,000 likes said:

“I just extended my contract to continue serving this country a week ago. How am I supposed to swear to support and defend the Constitution and a country that treats its women like second-class citizens?” She continued: “How am I supposed to do that? How am I supposed to do that with pride? How am I supposed to do that with love and honor?”



In HARRIS v. McRAE, 448 U.S. 297 (1980), the facade of Roe v Wade was exposed. The case was claiming that the government MUST pay for medically necessary abortions. They made it clear in that decision that the Constitution is NEGATIVE, not POSITIVE. It is a restraint upon government – not a shopping list of positive rights. This medic should resign, leave the country, and go someplace where you can freely kill a two-year-old when they annoy you.

If there was a Constitutional Right to abortion, but a restraint under the 8th Amendment against cruel and unusual punishment, then the solution would be to justify retroactive abortion without limitation so you no longer sentence someone to death, you merely abort their life whenever.

The very law that these people are so upset about was limiting abortion to the first 15 weeks. They seem to want even after-birth abortion. These real fanatics want to call a newborn still a fetus to justify abortion after birth.

“We claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.”

Why not just kill a child at any age when it threatens the “well-being of the family” if there is even a family that remains under this definition. There has always been justification for abortion when the life of the mother is at risk, or rape, or incest. But not any of these justify after-birth abortion. Sorry, but I don’t see how they would be good mothers and the solution should be sterilization – Gates would love it!





Help Support Independent Media, Please Donate or Subscribe:

Trending:

Views:
63

























Source link

Related articles

US completes new wave of strikes on Iran, hits Bandar Abbas

Affirmation of a recent, sustained US strike marketing campaign, spanning two separate waves inside a single day, reinforces the market's current danger premium on oil tied to Strait of Hormuz safety. The focusing...

Blackrock CEO Larry Fink ‘Very Bullish’ on Markets as Bitcoin Stabilizes

Key TakeawaysFink expects a bullish wave of technology-driven productiveness and margin enlargement to gasoline markets over the subsequent 12 months.He mentioned bitcoin and crypto are extra secure after a leverage shakeout lowered extreme...

Whatnot Acquires Formed to Bolster AI-Powered Discovery Throughout Its Reside Commerce Platform – AlleyWatch

Whatnot, the dwell social commerce market, has acquired Formed, a New York-based AI startup that builds real-time rating programs for suggestions and search. Phrases of the transaction weren't disclosed. As a part of...

Founder-Led Administration: When to Keep Concerned and When to Step Again.

Since Paul Graham printed “Founder Mode” in September 2024, founders have been handed a tempting new permission slip. Graham, drawing on a chat by Airbnb’s Brian Chesky, argued that the standard recommendation to...

5 good house devices I think about utterly non-negotiable – and why

I priced out motorized blinds months earlier than transferring into my townhome, and it is extremely costly while you undergo common set up firms. However, good blinds weren't one thing I may skip....
spot_img

Latest articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com