After-Birth Abortion – Really? – Investment Watch


by Martin Armstrong

The woman army medic who seems to be fighting for the Constitution clearly has no idea what the Constitution is all about. Here rant which gathered 30,000 likes said:

“I just extended my contract to continue serving this country a week ago. How am I supposed to swear to support and defend the Constitution and a country that treats its women like second-class citizens?” She continued: “How am I supposed to do that? How am I supposed to do that with pride? How am I supposed to do that with love and honor?”



In HARRIS v. McRAE, 448 U.S. 297 (1980), the facade of Roe v Wade was exposed. The case was claiming that the government MUST pay for medically necessary abortions. They made it clear in that decision that the Constitution is NEGATIVE, not POSITIVE. It is a restraint upon government – not a shopping list of positive rights. This medic should resign, leave the country, and go someplace where you can freely kill a two-year-old when they annoy you.

If there was a Constitutional Right to abortion, but a restraint under the 8th Amendment against cruel and unusual punishment, then the solution would be to justify retroactive abortion without limitation so you no longer sentence someone to death, you merely abort their life whenever.

The very law that these people are so upset about was limiting abortion to the first 15 weeks. They seem to want even after-birth abortion. These real fanatics want to call a newborn still a fetus to justify abortion after birth.

“We claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.”

Why not just kill a child at any age when it threatens the “well-being of the family” if there is even a family that remains under this definition. There has always been justification for abortion when the life of the mother is at risk, or rape, or incest. But not any of these justify after-birth abortion. Sorry, but I don’t see how they would be good mothers and the solution should be sterilization – Gates would love it!





Help Support Independent Media, Please Donate or Subscribe:

Trending:

Views:
63

























Source link

Related articles

Sony’s noise-canceling WH-1000XM6 are already on sale with a $30 present card

Lower than a month after making their debut, the WH-1000XM6 are on sale at Amazon in black, blue, and platinum with a $30 present card for $448. It’s not a straight money low...

Oil costs surge following Israel’s assault on Iran

(Bloomberg) – Oil jumped and shares slid after Israel attacked Iran’s nuclear program services and killed senior navy commanders in a major escalation of tensions within the Center East. ...

Stand up to 50 p.c off for Father’s Day

In case you're stumped on what to get your dad for Father's Day, think about a digital reward like a Nintendo Change On-line membership or a subscription to MasterClass. The latter has appeared...

Billionaire Snaps Up $100M Of Trump Coin After Investigation Ends

They are saying journalists by no means actually clock out. However for Christian, that is not only a metaphor, it is a way of life. By day, he navigates the ever-shifting tides of...

Why XRP Is Going Down As we speak? 4 Straight Losses amid SEC Strain and Israel-Iran Tensions

XRP value has tumbled to its lowest degree in over per week, falling to $2.0856 on Friday earlier than recovering barely to $2.1729 on Saturday, because the cryptocurrency faces stress from each geopolitical tensions and technical...
spot_img

Latest articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com