After-Birth Abortion – Really? – Investment Watch


by Martin Armstrong

The woman army medic who seems to be fighting for the Constitution clearly has no idea what the Constitution is all about. Here rant which gathered 30,000 likes said:

“I just extended my contract to continue serving this country a week ago. How am I supposed to swear to support and defend the Constitution and a country that treats its women like second-class citizens?” She continued: “How am I supposed to do that? How am I supposed to do that with pride? How am I supposed to do that with love and honor?”



In HARRIS v. McRAE, 448 U.S. 297 (1980), the facade of Roe v Wade was exposed. The case was claiming that the government MUST pay for medically necessary abortions. They made it clear in that decision that the Constitution is NEGATIVE, not POSITIVE. It is a restraint upon government – not a shopping list of positive rights. This medic should resign, leave the country, and go someplace where you can freely kill a two-year-old when they annoy you.

If there was a Constitutional Right to abortion, but a restraint under the 8th Amendment against cruel and unusual punishment, then the solution would be to justify retroactive abortion without limitation so you no longer sentence someone to death, you merely abort their life whenever.

The very law that these people are so upset about was limiting abortion to the first 15 weeks. They seem to want even after-birth abortion. These real fanatics want to call a newborn still a fetus to justify abortion after birth.

“We claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.”

Why not just kill a child at any age when it threatens the “well-being of the family” if there is even a family that remains under this definition. There has always been justification for abortion when the life of the mother is at risk, or rape, or incest. But not any of these justify after-birth abortion. Sorry, but I don’t see how they would be good mothers and the solution should be sterilization – Gates would love it!





Help Support Independent Media, Please Donate or Subscribe:

Trending:

Views:
63

























Source link

Related articles

Bitcoin HODLers Booked $120 Million In Earnings Throughout Worth Crash: Information

Keshav is at present a senior author at NewsBTC and has been connected to the web site since June 14, 2021. Keshav has been writing for a few years, first as a hobbyist...

USD/JPY breakout or yet one more fakeout?

It is no secret that the pair has largely been consolidating in between 146.00 to 149.00 for the higher a part of the final two months. And extra particularly, the vary is being...

$1M Bitcoin Again on the Radar: Coinbase CEO Sees Untapped Capital Tsunami

Bitcoin’s march towards $1 million is accelerating as regulation, sovereign demand, and institutional inflows ignite a robust long-term bull cycle. Bitcoin’s $1M Forecast Beneficial properties Momentum Bitcoin’s evolution right into a mainstream monetary...

Y Combinator launches ‘Early Choice’ for college kids who need to graduate first, construct later

For many years, Silicon Valley has valorized the school dropout. Founders like Invoice Gates, Steve Jobs, and Mark Zuckerberg left college early to construct corporations and so they grew to become billionaires.  That ethos...

SEC’s Chief Working Officer Ken Johnson to Retire After Eight Years in Function

The Securities and Change Fee introduced that Chief Working Officer Ken Johnson will retire in December, exiting a task he has held for about 8 years.A Profession on the SECJohnson joined the SEC in 2003...
spot_img

Latest articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com