Bittrex Fined $53M for Sanctions Violations


Key Takeaways

  • Bittrex has settled with the U.S. Treasury over allegations that it violated OFAC sanctions.
  • The Treasury alleges Bittrex carried out the supposed violations between 2014 and 2017.
  • While the Treasury fine is substantial, a number of mitigating factors were considered.

Share this article

Bittrex has been fined a total of $53 million for sanctions violations. While the Treasury cited the relative smallness of the transactions and Bittrex’s cooperation as mitigating factors, the company is still taking a hit.

Enforcement Action

Bittrex will pay $53 million in fines and penalties for violating U.S. Treasury sanctions as early as 2014.

According to an enforcement release from the Treasury, between March 28, 2014, and December 31, 2017, Bittrex facilitated crypto transactions among sanctioned entities.

“As a result of deficiencies related to Bittrex’s sanctions compliance procedures,” it states, “Bittrex failed to prevent persons apparently located in the Crimea region of Ukraine, Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria from using its platform to engage in approximately $263,451,600.13 worth of virtual currency-related transactions.”

The Treasury further claimed Bittrex’s policies and procedures demonstrated at least a partial awareness of OFAC sanctions as early as August 2015. It further alleges that “based on internet protocol (“IP”) address information and physical address information… Bittrex had reason to know that these users were in jurisdictions subject to sanctions.”

The Treasury also listed several mitigating factors it had taken into consideration in the case, including the fact that it was a relatively new company at the time, that it cooperated substantially with the investigation, and that the offending transactions were relatively small amounts. Potential penalties could have been as high as $465 million if not for these mitigating factors.

Update: This article previously reported a total penalty of $30 million. It has been updated to reflect the most accurate numbers available. 

Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author of this piece owned BTC, ETH, and several other cryptocurrencies.

Share this article



Source link

Related articles

Financial institution of America Quietly Prepares for Crypto Shockwave With ‘On Chain’ Drilldown

Financial institution of America is accelerating Wall Avenue’s crypto pivot with a brand new analysis push dissecting stablecoins, tokenized belongings, and the infrastructure poised to redefine digital finance. ‘On Chain’ Launch Alerts Wall...

TikTok proprietor ByteDance is reportedly constructing its personal combined actuality goggles

ByteDance, the mother or father firm of TikTok, is reportedly engaged on combined actuality goggles, The Data reviews. The in-development machine is designed to layer digital objects over your view of the true...

10 Overvalued Dividend Shares To Keep away from

Printed on July 14th, 2025 by Bob Ciura The S&P 500 has been traditionally overvalued (in hindsight) continuous since 2010 utilizing the Shiller P/E ratio. The Shiller P/E ratio makes use of a mean of...

Redefining international commerce infrastructure: TradeOS joins Cointelegraph Accelerator

TradeOS, the belief and settlement layer for international commerce, is now a part of the Cointelegraph Accelerator. Positioned as the muse of next-gen stablecoin-based uniserval checkout, TradeOS is constructing an open, permissionless international...

25 Highlights AI Limits in Buying and selling

On the Finance Magnates Africa Summit 2025, monetary analyst Mj Givens Kgasi opened with a direct give attention to the core themes of his presentation.In a session titled “The Way forward for CFD Buying and...
spot_img

Latest articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com