Shock, shock. Opposite to standard knowledge, the bond market could also be taking its threat cues from equities. At the very least, that seems to be the case when fluctuations within the two main volatility indices are in contrast.
Fairness buyers typically look to the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) as a gauge of worry or future uncertainty within the inventory market. In the meantime, fixed-income buyers depend on the Merrill Lynch Choice Volatility Estimate (MOVE Index) to trace expectations of future volatility within the bond market. However which market units the tone for the opposite? Does one in every of these volatility measures lead the opposite, or are they merely reacting to distinct sources of threat inside their very own domains?
Difficult Assumptions: Proof That Equities Lead Bond
To reply that query, we examined how the VIX and MOVE indices have interacted over time, utilizing each day information going again to 2003.
Our evaluation revealed a stunning consequence: whereas fluctuations within the MOVE index don’t predict actions within the VIX, modifications within the VIX do assist forecast future strikes within the MOVE index.
This flips typical knowledge. Buyers typically assume that the bond market, with its sensitivity to rate of interest expectations and macroeconomic indicators, units the tone for equities. However no less than in the case of market-implied future uncertainty, the connection seems reversed: the bond market is taking its cues from shares.
To discover this, we checked out how the 2 indices behave collectively. During the last 20 years, they’ve typically moved in tandem, significantly during times of macroeconomic stress, with a 30-day rolling correlation that averaged round 0.59. However correlation isn’t causation. To check for a predictive relationship, we used Granger causality evaluation, which helps decide whether or not one time sequence improves forecasts of one other. In our case, the reply was clear: the VIX leads.
Market Stress and Non permanent Bond Management
Curiously, the sample shifts during times of elevated stress. When each the VIX and MOVE indices spike above their seventy fifth percentile ranges, indicating a high-volatility interval, we observe a reversal: the MOVE index exhibits some predictive energy over the VIX. In these moments, equities seem to take cues from bonds. Whereas uncommon, this exception means that in occasions of acute uncertainty, the same old move of knowledge between markets can briefly reverse.
One solution to interpret these outcomes is that as a result of the MOVE index appears to take the lead during times of maximum uncertainty, bond managers are extra attune to large macro shifts within the financial system and seize huge sentiment shifts higher than fairness managers (i.e., once we go from optimistic to detrimental momentum).
Implications for Multi-Asset and Hedging Methods
These findings could have probably the most impression not for buyers that make investments solely in a single asset, however extra so for buyers which might be unfold throughout numerous asset courses. The outcomes spotlight that for multi-asset managers, in the case of assessing worry available in the market, it might be finest to concentrate to the bond market when huge strikes in worry or uncertainty change into obvious. However when coping with small actions within the notion of future uncertainty, the inventory market could surprisingly be the higher measure of threat to trace.
These outcomes even have robust implications for buyers who are usually not within the fairness market or the debt market, but use them to hedge threat. If a commodities dealer is on the lookout for early indicators of massive strikes within the fairness market or bond market to get out of commodities, they might wish to shift their consideration between the VIX and the MOVE indices as regimes transfer.
These findings problem a long-standing assumption: that the bond market all the time leads. At the very least in the case of measuring future uncertainty, equities appear to set the tone, besides, notably, in probably the most risky moments, when bonds regain their affect. It seems that, generally, the bond market is wanting extra to the fairness marketplace for future assessments of threat quite than the opposite approach round. These outcomes advantage additional research, not simply into which market is main the opposite, however how this spillover of uncertainty travels between them.
