I. Abstract: The Ideological Divide in Digital Belongings
The digital asset market, a quickly maturing and politically charged ecosystem, is outlined by a basic ideological schism between two dominant faculties of thought: the philosophy of Bitcoin Maximalism and the extra heterogeneous philosophy of Altcoin Holders (Altcoiners). This text supplies a complete evaluation of those competing worldviews, grounded within the public discourse discovered on platforms like X and different web publications. The evaluation demonstrates that this divide will not be merely an funding alternative however a profound disagreement on the very function, future, and moral underpinnings of digital cash.
The Bitcoin Maximalist, or “Maxi,” philosophy is rooted in an unwavering perception that Bitcoin is the one digital asset with long-term viability. This angle is a direct mental and ideological descendant of the cypherpunk motion, born from a deep mistrust of centralized monetary and governmental establishments. For maximalists, Bitcoin’s core virtues — unparalleled safety, absolute shortage, and radical decentralisation — are non-negotiable and enough for it to turn out to be the singular, international “digital gold”. Their funding technique, encapsulated by the time period “HODL,” is an ideological dedication to wealth preservation and an act of religion in Bitcoin’s inevitable success. All different digital property are considered with profound skepticism, typically dismissed as centralised, insecure, or fraudulent distractions from Bitcoin’s core mission.
In distinction, the Altcoin Holder philosophy is a extra various and pragmatic assortment of beliefs centered on the worth of innovation and particular utility. Proponents of this view reject the maximalist thesis of a single-asset future, as an alternative advocating for a vibrant, multi-asset ecosystem the place totally different blockchains and tokens can clear up a wider vary of technical and real-world issues. This philosophy frames altcoins not as opponents to Bitcoin however as a complementary “innovation engine,” providing developments in pace, scalability, and performance via applied sciences like sensible contracts and decentralised functions (dApps). Their funding technique relies on diversification and a pursuit of uneven returns, in search of out new and rising tasks with excessive development potential.
The foundational occasion that solidified this schism was the contentious “Block Measurement Warfare” of 2017. This technical debate over learn how to scale Bitcoin’s community created a everlasting ideological break up, with the victory of the “small blockers” confirming Bitcoin’s path as a safe, decentralised retailer of worth somewhat than a quick, low-cost cost system. This historic occasion continues to form the narratives of each camps. A more moderen debate, the Saylor-Buterin conflict over institutional custody, reveals a essential, fashionable schism inside the Bitcoin neighborhood itself. This battle exposes a deep divide between “pure” cypherpunks resembling Adam Again who champion radical self-sovereignty and “pragmatic” institutionalists who imagine Bitcoin’s future lies in its integration with conventional finance. The broader evaluation reveals that whereas Bitcoiners are pushed by a singular, anti-establishment ethos, the altcoin neighborhood is motivated by a extra assorted set of targets, from technological progress to portfolio diversification. In the end, these competing philosophies outline the market’s dynamics, influencing every thing from funding patterns to regulatory landscapes.
II. Introduction: The Nice Digital Asset Schism
2.1. The Basis of Disagreement
The talk over Bitcoin versus altcoins is a central organising precept of the digital asset world, and an examination of its public discourse reveals two distinct and infrequently opposing philosophies. On the coronary heart of this battle lies a basic disagreement over the best nature of cash and know-how.
Defining Bitcoin Maximalism A Bitcoin Maximalist is a person who holds the conviction that Bitcoin is the one cryptocurrency with long-term viability and that each one different digital property are, at greatest, pointless and, at worst, essentially flawed or fraudulent. This ideology is usually described as “Bitcoin dominance maximalism” by figures like Vitalik Buterin, who characterised it because the view {that a} multi-currency surroundings is undesirable and that Bitcoin is destined for a monopoly place resulting from its inherent superiority. Maximalists imagine that different cryptocurrencies fail to align with the core beliefs established by Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. This angle will not be a easy desire for Bitcoin; it’s a profound perception that constructing on another blockchain is an unethical deviation from the proper path.
Defining the Altcoin Holder Philosophy The philosophy of the Altcoin Holder will not be a single, monolithic ideology however a extra assorted and pragmatic college of thought. It’s outlined by a perception in a multi-asset ecosystem the place cryptocurrencies can serve a mess of functions past being a easy retailer of worth. This philosophy rejects the maximalist premise, arguing {that a} various set of property is important to deal with the big selection of technical and real-world challenges that Bitcoin can not or won’t clear up. Altcoin holders view diversification as a key threat administration technique, distributing their investments throughout totally different property to mitigate the influence of market volatility. They imagine that the market is a dynamic engine of innovation the place new tasks with distinctive use instances will proceed to emerge and thrive, co-existing with and even surpassing Bitcoin in particular domains.
2.2. A Story of Two Narratives
The philosophical divide between these two camps traces its origins to the earliest days of the cryptocurrency market. Whereas Bitcoin was the only digital asset for its first two years, the emergence of the primary altcoins round 2011 marked the genesis of this battle. Nonetheless, the talk’s basis was really solidified by the “Block Measurement Warfare” of 2017. This extremely contentious interval of inner strife inside the Bitcoin neighborhood led to a everlasting schism and the creation of Bitcoin Money (BCH), a separate cryptocurrency designed with a special philosophy on scalability. This occasion is a essential second for understanding why these two philosophical camps have grown so distinct and why their narratives diverge so sharply.
The general public area for this debate is primarily on-line, with platforms like X (previously Twitter) serving as the principle battleground. Distinguished figures from each side use these channels to advance their arguments, rally supporters, and publicly criticise opposing viewpoints. The evaluation on this article is grounded within the public discourse of those influential voices, tracing how their statements and writings contribute to the broader ideological battle that shapes all the market.
III. The Bitcoin Maximalist Philosophy: ‘Digital Gold’ and Uncompromising Rules
3.1. The Foundational Ethos: The Pursuit of ‘Sound Cash’
The Bitcoin Maximalist philosophy is greater than a monetary technique; it’s a political and moral assertion. The motion is deeply rooted in an anti-establishment, cypherpunk ethos, born from the disillusionment that adopted the 2008 international monetary disaster. From this angle, the standard monetary system is inherently flawed and vulnerable to corruption, with central banks capable of manipulate the cash provide for political agendas, resulting in inflation and financial instability.
A core tenet of this perception system is the rejection of human-controlled establishments in favour of mathematically verifiable know-how. The philosophy posits that Bitcoin’s immutable, clear, and decentralised protocol is extra reliable than any particular person, financial institution, or authorities. Robert Breedlove, a distinguished Bitcoin thinker, articulates this by arguing that Bitcoin’s know-how is a “fact system” that may by no means lie or return on its phrase, thereby instituting a special, extra clear mannequin of sovereignty. This belief in know-how over folks is a foundational pillar of the “True Bitcoiner” ideology, which reduces perceived threat and uncertainty by counting on the code’s integrity somewhat than human fallibility.
3.2. Core Tenets and Arguments
The maximalist worldview is constructed upon a set of agency convictions about Bitcoin’s inherent and insurmountable superiority. These arguments are regularly superior on X and different platforms by distinguished maximalists.
The Supremacy of Safety and Decentralisation: Maximalists argue that Bitcoin’s sturdy, decade-plus observe file of safety is its single most dear attribute. The community is secured by its energy-intensive Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism, which requires immense computational energy to assault, making it prohibitively costly to tamper with the ledger. Proponents contend that this stage of decentralisation, with no single chief or central authority, is unmatched by another cryptocurrency. They imagine that sacrificing pace or scalability to keep up this safety and decentralisation is a vital trade-off. This core perception leads them to critique competing networks like Ethereum for having a extra centralised mining or validator construction.
Shortage as a Ethical and Financial Crucial: The “digital gold” narrative is central to the maximalist philosophy. Bitcoin’s hard-coded, mounted provide of 21 million cash is seen as an ideal hedge towards the devaluation of fiat currencies attributable to “uncontrolled cash printing”. This shortage is considered as a deliberate, moral counterpoint to inflationary authorities insurance policies. For maximalists, this restricted provide ensures Bitcoin’s long-term worth appreciation and establishes it as a superior type of “onerous cash” that can’t be manipulated at will.
The Community Impact and Unwavering Dominance: Maximalists persistently level to Bitcoin’s first-mover benefit, largest market capitalisation, and most in depth community as proof of its inevitable dominance. They argue that the community impact — the place the worth of a community will increase as extra contributors be part of — creates an insurmountable lead over another digital asset. This in depth consumer base, developer ecosystem, and infrastructure make it resilient and viable as a world financial normal, a feat they imagine no different undertaking can replicate.
The ‘Pseudo-Anonymity’ of a Public Ledger: The philosophy holds that Bitcoin’s clear and public ledger is a characteristic, not a vulnerability. Whereas all transactions are publicly verifiable, customers can stay pseudo-anonymous by not linking their real-world identities to their pockets addresses. This supplies a steadiness between transparency, which helps to stop corruption, and privateness, which protects particular person monetary freedom.
3.3. Funding and Behavioural Philosophy: The HODL Mandate
Probably the most seen manifestation of the maximalist philosophy is their funding behaviour, which is outlined by the time period “HODL”. Originating from a easy typo for “maintain,” “HODL” has advanced into an acronym for “Maintain On for Expensive Life,” signifying a long-term dedication to a cryptocurrency no matter short-term value swings. For Bitcoiners, HODLing is not only a buy-and-hold technique; it’s an ideological dedication to the undertaking’s long-term imaginative and prescient. It represents a rejection of the short-term buying and selling that defines a lot of the broader crypto market and an act of religion in Bitcoin’s inevitable success in creating a brand new social and monetary order.
This unwavering conviction results in deep skepticism towards altcoins. Maximalists are unapologetically in favour of a Bitcoin monopoly and examine different digital property as “inferior,” “unethical,” or outright “scams”. The idea that the value of Bitcoin tends to affect all altcoin costs reinforces the maximalist argument that investing in them is a “questionable manner of diversifying” a portfolio.
3.4. Key Voices from the Public Sphere
The maximalist philosophy is personified by a lot of influential figures who leverage platforms like X to evangelise their beliefs.
- Michael Saylor: The CEO of MicroStrategy, Michael Saylor is an outspoken Bitcoin evangelist who has led his firm to build up a multi-billion greenback Bitcoin treasury. He regularly argues that Bitcoin is a superior asset class to conventional holdings like gold or shares and believes it would ultimately take over because the world’s main retailer of worth. His public statements on X and in media interviews persistently body Bitcoin as the one asset worthy of company and institutional adoption.
- Jack Dorsey: The founding father of X and Block, Jack Dorsey is a number one maximalist who has overtly said his perception that Bitcoin will ultimately change the US greenback. He has used his platform to advertise Bitcoin-only tasks and has been a vocal critic of Ethereum and different altcoins.
- Anthony “Pomp” Pompliano: As a co-founder of a significant crypto-focused enterprise agency, Anthony Pompliano is a distinguished voice within the maximalist camp. Recognized for his pro-Bitcoin commentary and deep insights into macroeconomic developments, he makes use of his massive following on X to argue for Bitcoin’s place as the way forward for cash.
IV. The Altcoin Holder Philosophy: Innovation, Utility, and Diversification
4.1. Past the Monolith: A Philosophy of Evolution
The Altcoin Holder philosophy is a direct repudiation of the maximalist view that Bitcoin is an ideal and unchangeable system. As an alternative, this angle is based on the idea that innovation is an ongoing course of and that the proliferation of latest digital property is an indication of a vibrant, wholesome ecosystem, not a sign of inferiority. Proponents of this view see Bitcoin as a technologically static “dinosaur” and argue that its limitations — resembling sluggish transaction speeds and excessive power consumption — necessitate the event of different options.
The philosophy will not be a couple of single “Bitcoin killer” however about creating a various panorama of digital property, every with a selected function. This pragmatic view sees the crypto market not as a single foreign money however as a brand new monetary and technological frontier the place totally different protocols, consensus mechanisms, and use instances will emerge to deal with all kinds of issues.
4.2. Core Tenets and Arguments
The Altcoiners philosophy is constructed on a number of key arguments which can be regularly superior by its proponents on social media and in on-line publications.
The Innovation Engine: The central argument is that altcoins are the first drivers of innovation within the crypto area. They’re designed to enhance upon Bitcoin’s know-how by providing enhanced options resembling quicker transaction speeds, decrease charges, better scalability, and extra energy-efficient consensus mechanisms. For instance, altcoins like Solana and Ethereum supply far greater transaction throughput than Bitcoin, making them extra appropriate for high-volume functions.
Performance Over Shortage: Whereas acknowledging Bitcoin’s function as a retailer of worth, altcoin holders emphasise utility and performance because the true measure of a digital asset’s worth. They spotlight platforms that allow sensible contracts and decentralised functions (dApps), which have given rise to complete new sectors like Decentralised Finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). They argue that this programmability and utility make these networks the inspiration of the subsequent technology of the web, a use case that Bitcoin, by design, can not fulfil.
Portfolio Diversification as a Key Technique: A core precept of the altcoin holder philosophy is diversification as a method of threat administration. Not like the maximalist “focus” mannequin, which views different property as distractions, altcoin holders imagine that distributing investments throughout a wide range of property — from large-cap cash like Ethereum to stablecoins and sector-specific utility tokens — can mitigate market volatility and supply publicity to totally different high-growth sectors. This method is seen as a extra smart and pragmatic approach to navigate the inherently unstable crypto market.
4.3. Funding and Behavioural Philosophy: The Pursuit of Uneven Returns
Altcoin holders are typically extra risk-tolerant and examine the market as a panorama of alternatives for vital development. Their funding behaviour is characterised by a “hunt for the subsequent altcoin to blow up,” a seek for property with high-growth potential that may yield substantial returns, particularly throughout bull cycles. This stands in stark distinction to the maximalist give attention to long-term wealth preservation.
The narrative surrounding altcoins has advanced over time. Whereas some early altcoins had been positioned as “Bitcoin killers,” the trendy altcoin narrative is usually extra nuanced. Distinguished altcoin advocates now typically body their tasks as complementary to Bitcoin, seeing it because the “basis” of the ecosystem whereas altcoins present the “wings” for innovation and development. This shift from a confrontational to a extra co-existing narrative displays a maturation of the market and a recognition of Bitcoin’s established function because the trade’s benchmark asset.
4.4. Key Voices from the Public Sphere
The altcoin holder philosophy is championed by influential figures who use their public platforms to advocate for a multi-chain future.
- Vitalik Buterin: Because the co-founder of Ethereum, the most important altcoin by market capitalisation, Vitalik Buterin is probably the most distinguished voice within the altcoin camp. He has been a constant critic of Bitcoin Maximalism since 2014 and has used X to argue for the need of sensible contracts, scalability, and different improvements that he believes Bitcoin lacks.
- Erik Voorhees: A self-described “crypto-preneur” and a real “OG” of the area, Erik Voorhees is a vocal advocate for a multi-coin future. Because the founding father of ShapeShift, a crypto trade platform, he has lengthy promoted the concept of an open, permissionless ecosystem the place a number of digital property can coexist and supply worth.
V. Factors of Ideological Collision and Nuanced Debates
The philosophical divide between Bitcoin Maximalists and Altcoin Holders will not be static; it’s continually formed by key historic occasions and ongoing debates that reveal the core values of every camp.
5.1. The Block Measurement Warfare: A Seminal Occasion for a Philosophical Break up
Probably the most vital occasion within the historical past of this schism was the contentious “Block Measurement Warfare” of 2017. The talk was a technical disagreement over a seemingly easy query: how ought to Bitcoin scale to deal with a rising variety of transactions? Nonetheless, this technical drawback served as a proxy for a basic ideological battle about Bitcoin’s function.
On one facet had been the “massive blockers,” who advocated for rising the block dimension restrict to permit for extra transactions and decrease charges. This faction, which ultimately forked to create Bitcoin Money (BCH), noticed Bitcoin as a cost system that wanted to be quick and low cost to realize widespread adoption. On the opposite facet had been the “small blockers,” who prioritised preserving the decentralisation and safety that got here from small blocks, arguing {that a} bigger block dimension would improve the assets wanted to run a full node, resulting in centralisation of mining and management. The small blockers finally prevailed, with the implementation of SegWit, an answer that elevated transaction capability with out essentially altering the block dimension restrict.
The legacy of this “warfare” is profound. The victory of the small blockers solidified Bitcoin’s identification as a safe, decentralised retailer of worth somewhat than a quick, low cost foreign money for day by day transactions. This occasion created a everlasting schism locally and is the one most vital second for understanding why Bitcoiners at the moment prioritise safety and decentralisation above all else, whereas altcoin holders are targeted on constructing networks which can be extra scalable and practical for particular use instances. The creation of Bitcoin Money marked a literal and philosophical break up, with BCH proponents persevering with to advocate for a imaginative and prescient of Bitcoin as a quick, peer-to-peer digital money system.
5.2. The Custody Conundrum: A Schism Inside the Schism
A more moderen debate has highlighted a brand new, nuanced division, this time inside the Bitcoin neighborhood itself. This battle got here to a head in a high-profile trade between Michael Saylor and Vitalik Buterin over the institutional custody of Bitcoin.
Saylor has publicly argued that entrusting Bitcoin to “too massive to fail” regulated monetary establishments like BlackRock and Constancy is a safer and extra secure method. He has dismissed the issues of self-custody advocates because the views of “paranoid crypto-anarchists” who disregard authorities authority and tax obligations. Saylor believes that these established establishments present a reputable and safe pathway for Bitcoin to realize mass adoption and dampen its volatility.
In a swift and sharp response, Vitalik Buterin lambasted Saylor’s stance as “batshit insane”. Buterin, together with different crypto pioneers like Erik Voorhees, argued that endorsing third-party custody essentially undermines the core decentralised and self-sovereign ideas upon which Bitcoin was constructed. They view Saylor’s place as an argument for “regulatory seize,” the place highly effective entities would maintain undue affect over the crypto area, a direct betrayal of the unique ethos of trustlessness and censorship resistance.
This debate is a microcosm of a bigger, extra delicate philosophical rigidity. It exposes a basic divergence inside the Bitcoin neighborhood itself, between those that imagine in radical, particular person monetary sovereignty and people who imagine Bitcoin’s future lies in a realistic integration with the prevailing conventional monetary system (TradFi). This isn’t a easy binary of Bitcoin vs. altcoins; it’s a extra advanced philosophical spectrum the place the definition of “decentralisation” and “trustlessness” is being contested from inside.
5.3. The Downside with “The Different Aspect”: A Polemical Divide
The ideological schism manifests in a mutual and infrequently polemical condemnation of the “different facet.” Bitcoin Maximalists use a wide range of arguments to dismiss altcoins. They typically depend on the idea of “community results” to argue that Bitcoin’s supremacy is insurmountable and that altcoins are merely inferior ventures that lack the identical stage of safety or decentralisation. They regularly criticise altcoins for being centralised, vulnerable to pump-and-dump schemes, or missing a transparent, defensible ideological basis.
In return, altcoin advocates criticise Bitcoin for what they see as its ideological rigidity and technological stagnation. They level to its sluggish transaction speeds, excessive power consumption, and lack of modern options, claiming that it’s “shedding” the innovation race to extra dynamic and agile networks. The mutual skepticism underscores the depth of the philosophical divide. Maximalists see altcoin holders as speculators who’re lacking the purpose of “sound cash,” whereas altcoin holders see maximalists as dogmatic purists who’re hindering the progress and utility of all the digital asset area.
VI. Conclusion: A Synthesis of Insights and Ahead Outlook
The philosophical warfare between Bitcoin Maximalists and Altcoin Holders is a defining characteristic of the digital asset panorama. It represents a basic divergence in values and a contest between two distinct visions for the way forward for cash and know-how. The Bitcoin Maximalist philosophy is a purist, uncompromising creed that prioritises safety, shortage, and decentralisation as the final word virtues. This worldview is deeply rooted within the anti-establishment ethos of its origins and views Bitcoin’s function as the one, uncorrupted retailer of worth for an more and more advanced world. In distinction, the Altcoiners philosophy is a realistic and pluralistic method that champions innovation, utility, and scalability. This angle embraces the concept of a multi-asset ecosystem, the place totally different protocols and tokens can handle a variety of real-world issues and supply alternatives for high-growth returns via diversification.
This evaluation reveals that the ideological schism will not be a easy binary. The interior debate over institutional custody, as exemplified by the Saylor-Buterin conflict, demonstrates a extra advanced philosophical spectrum. It reveals that even inside the Bitcoin neighborhood, there are deep divisions over whether or not the asset’s future lies in its radical separation from conventional finance or its pragmatic integration with it. This dynamic means that the talk will proceed to evolve because the market matures and as establishments and regulators play a extra vital function.
For buyers, understanding these philosophies is essential for anticipating market sentiment and comprehending the long-term trajectory of digital property. The narratives superior by every camp have direct implications for market dynamics, together with portfolio allocation and threat administration. Because the market continues to develop, it’s seemingly that the ideological warfare will shift from direct confrontation to a coexistence, with every asset class carving out its personal function within the international monetary panorama. Bitcoin could keep its place because the premier retailer of worth and macro asset, whereas altcoins proceed to operate because the “innovation engine” for dApps, DeFi, and different use instances.
The next tables summarise the core philosophical frameworks and the important thing figures who champion them, offering a high-level reference for the evaluation introduced on this report.
Works cited
- Bitcoin Maximalism: Definition, Philosophy, Benefits, and Obstacles — Investopedia, https://www.investopedia.com/phrases/b/bitcoin-maximalism.asp
- The Ethics and Philosophy of Bitcoin by Robert Breedlove, https://btcprague.com/the-philosophy-and-ethics-of-bitcoin/
- Bitcoin Maximalism: The Philosophy of One True Cryptocurrency — Lightspark, https://www.lightspark.com/glossary/bitcoin-maximalism
- Bitcoin vs Altcoins: Which One Ought to You Select? — Deccan Chronicle, https://www.deccanchronicle.com/enterprise/bitcoin-vs-altcoins-which-one-should-you-choose-1874604
- Bitcoin Maximalism | Glossary, https://bitcointreasuries.web/glossary/bitcoin-maximalism
- Understanding HODL: How “Maintain On for Expensive Life” Shapes Crypto Investing — Investopedia, https://www.investopedia.com/phrases/h/hodl.asp
- (PDF) “The Most Reliable Coin”: How Ideological Tensions Drive …, https://www.researchgate.web/publication/337129843_The_Most_Trustworthy_Coin_How_Ideological_Tensions_Drive_Trust_in_Bitcoin
- What Is a Bitcoin Maximalist? | Ledn Weblog, https://www.ledn.io/put up/what-is-a-bitcoin-maximalist
- Crypto Portfolio Fundamentals: The Key to a Effectively-Balanced Portfolio in 2024 | Caleb & Brown, https://calebandbrown.com/weblog/balanced-crypto-portfolio/
- What are Altcoins? Professionals, Cons, and Sorts Defined — NuFi, https://nu.fi/weblog/what-are-altcoins-pros-cons-and-types-explained
- Bitcoin Vs. Altcoins: An In-depth Comparability | ZebPay, https://zebpay.com/weblog/bitcoin-vs-altcoins-comparison
- 10 Essential Cryptocurrencies Different Than Bitcoin — Investopedia, https://www.investopedia.com/tech/most-important-cryptocurrencies-other-than-bitcoin/
- MYX Finance, Worldcoin, MemeCore Set New All-Time Highs — These Altcoins Might Be Subsequent, https://cryptodnes.bg/en/myx-finance-worldcoin-memecore-set-new-all-time-highs-these-altcoins-could-be-next/
- Bitcoin Maximalist: Overview, Philosophy, Professionals, and Cons | The Motley Idiot, https://www.idiot.com/phrases/b/bitcoin-maximalist/
- Bitcoin vs. Bitcoin Money: What’s the Distinction? — Investopedia, https://www.investopedia.com/tech/bitcoin-vs-bitcoin-cash-whats-difference/ 16. Bitcoin Maximalism vs Altcoins: Key Insights for Crypto Traders — CoinShares, https://coinshares.com/us/insights/information/the-debate-on-bitcoin-maximalism-exploring-arguments-for-and-against/
- Prime 10 Crypto Accounts to Comply with on X — 101 Blockchains, https://101blockchains.com/top-crypto-accounts-to-follow-on-x/
- Prime 10+ Crypto Influencers on Twitter to Comply with in 2025 — Blockchain-Advertisements, https://www.blockchain-ads.com/put up/crypto-influencers-on-twitter
- Prime Crypto Influencers on X (Twitter) You Ought to Comply with in 2025 | Coin Pockets, https://coin.area/top-crypto-influencers-on-x-twitter-you-should-follow-in-2025/
- The Greatest Crypto X (Twitter) Influencers to Comply with in 2025 — Coinbound, https://coinbound.io/best-crypto-influencers-on-twitter/
- Cryptosovereignty: The Political Philosophy of Bitcoin — YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CxinUXC9a8
- Bitcoin Maximalists | Binance Academy, https://academy.binance.com/en/glossary/bitcoin-maximalists
- Bitcoin vs Altcoins: Key Variations, Tendencies & Funding Suggestions, https://komodoplatform.com/en/weblog/bitcoin-vs-altcoins-which-has-the-stronger-long-term-potential/
- Bitcoin and ether: ranges of decentralisation | ForkLog, https://forklog.com/en/bitcoin-and-ether-levels-of-decentralisation-2/
- Why is Bitcoin known as digital gold? — 21Bitcoin, https://21bitcoin.app/en/weblog/why-is-bitcoin-referred-to-as-digital-gold
- Why is Bitcoin digital gold? — 21Shares, https://www.21shares.com/en-us/analysis/why-is-bitcoin-digital-gold
- Ought to I Put money into Altcoins As an alternative of Bitcoin? — Every day Emerald, https://dailyemerald.com/160416/promotedposts/should-i-invest-in-altcoins-instead-of-bitcoin/
- Understanding Altcoins: Sorts, Advantages, and Market Potential — Investopedia, https://www.investopedia.com/phrases/a/altcoin.asp
- The Three Main Evolutionary Narratives of Ethereum — Moomoo, https://www.moomoo.com/information/put up/55877843/the-three-major-evolutionary-narratives-of-ethereum
- Visions of Bitcoin. How main Bitcoin narratives modified… | by Nic Carter — Medium, https://medium.com/@nic__carter/visions-of-bitcoin-4b7b7cbcd24c
- Prime 19 Crypto Influencers to Comply with for Insights and Tendencies — Ninja Promo, https://ninjapromo.io/top-crypto-influencers
- Block dimension restrict controversy — Bitcoin Wiki, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Block_size_limit_controversy
- Crypto Conflict: Vitalik Buterin Labels Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin Feedback ‘Batshit Insane’, https://www.mitrade.com/insights/information/live-news/article-3-427875-20241024
- Vitalik Buterin Slams Michael Saylor’s Name for Large Banks to Custody Bitcoin — Changelly, https://changelly.com/weblog/vitalik-buterin-slams-michael-saylors-call-for-big-banks-to-custody-bitcoin/
- Michael Saylor’s touch upon regulated bitcoin custody attracts criticism from Vitalik Buterin, https://www.theblock.co/put up/322578/michael-saylor-paranoid-crypto-anarchists-vitalik-buterin
- Vitalik Buterin Slams Michael Saylor’s Push for Institutional Bitcoin Custody, https://cryptodnes.bg/en/vitalik-buterin-slams-michael-saylors-push-for-institutional-bitcoin-custody/
