Since Harry Markowitz developed fashionable portfolio concept’s mean-variance optimization (MVO), monetary advisors and wealth managers have been confronted with a vital query: What’s the relative significance of threat tolerance (the investor’s perspective towards threat) in comparison with threat capability (the investor’s capacity to endure damaging outcomes)?
I have to confess that I’ve been perplexed by this query for many years. My frequent co-author, Paul Kaplan, and I imagine we now have solved this 50+ yr conundrum utilizing an expanded MVO optimization mannequin referred to as internet value optimization (NWO).
I plan to debate our findings on my panel at CFA Institute LIVE 2025 in Chicago in Might.
How did we get right here?
The objective (goal perform) of mean-variance optimization is to maximise the anticipated return of a portfolio, minus a customized penalty for the anticipated threat (variance) of the portfolio. Personalised penalty is the investor’s threat tolerance coefficient multiplied by the variance of the portfolio.
In MVO, the “threat tolerance” coefficient is a single quantity reflecting the speed at which the investor is keen to commerce off extra threat in pursuit of extra anticipated return. Understanding the investor’s threat tolerance coefficient means that you can resolve for the corresponding MVO environment friendly portfolio.
Within the economics literature and the works of Nobel Prize winners like Paul Samuelson, threat tolerance is clearly associated to the investor’s perspective towards threat, not threat capability.
Advisors continuously have a deep understanding of their purchasers’ conditions. This may embody data on extra accounts, spousal belongings, compensation data, mortgage funds, and so on. Some purchasers could also be very comfy with threat, however with little capability for adversarial outcomes given their circumstances. Whereas different purchasers are extraordinarily uncomfortable with threat however can tolerate adversarial outcomes with little impression on their monetary well-being. Advisors discover themselves navigating what has been a extremely subjective threat tolerance (perspective) versus threat capability conundrum.
Two Approaches to Threat Capability
Pragmatically, there have been two approaches that explicitly concentrate on threat capability.
The primary strategy is a standard characteristic of the “scoring” element of threat tolerance questionnaires. When scoring the responses to a threat tolerance questionnaire, there are continuously two scores: a threat tolerance rating and a time horizon rating. The time horizon rating serves as a crude proxy for the investor’s capability to tackle threat that limits which portfolios are deemed appropriate.
The second strategy might be much less recognized to practitioners however prevalent within the practitioner-oriented literature. This strategy is greatest represented by the “discretionary wealth speculation” primarily put forth by Jarrod Willcox.[1] In a majority of these approaches, the investor’s perspective towards threat is discounted or ignored, and monetary ratios just like the ratio of assets-to-liabilities are used as the first issue to estimate a so-called “threat tolerance coefficient. I exploit quotes to differentiate this from the financial definition of threat tolerance as an perspective.
Internet Value Optimization (NWO)
In our 2024 CFA Institute Analysis Basis e-book, “Lifetime Monetary Recommendation,” Kaplan and I put forth NWO. It’s a important extension of MVO. NWO consists of the entire investor’s belongings and labilities within the optimization, particularly human capital, and it optimizes the investor’s holistic financial steadiness sheet.
An investor’s financial steadiness sheet consists of all his or her belongings — house, land, collectables, and all monetary belongings. Most significantly, the financial steadiness sheet consists of the capitalized worth of the investor’s lifetime of earnings — human capital. For many individuals, the mortality weighted internet current worth of all future labor revenue, together with deferred labor revenue within the type of outlined advantages and social safety, is their single largest asset.
The lifetime of money flows stemming from human capital is continuously harking back to the money flows you’ll obtain from a big, inflation-linked, long-duration bond. Others have much less regular human capital that may resemble a inventory/bond combine.
On the right-side of an financial steadiness sheet, all of us have ongoing bills, corresponding to hire, a mortgage, insurance coverage, medical prices, and meals. Whereas these will not be authorized liabilities, these bills are sometimes inescapable. Collectively, their capitalized values type what we consider because the investor’s nondiscretionary consumption legal responsibility.
Simply as a steadiness sheet is a crucial indicator of a company’s monetary well being, a holistic particular person financial steadiness sheet is a superb indicator of the investor’s general monetary well being and capability for taking over threat. The distinction between the entire worth of all belongings and all liabilities is internet value. Therefore the time period internet value optimization or NWO.
NWO consists of all the main financial steadiness sheet entries. Nontradable entries — the investor’s human capital and nondiscretionary consumption legal responsibility — are included within the optimization, though the optimizer can’t change the online current worth of both. These nontradeable belongings are modeled as portfolios of asset lessons, which allow us to derive correct market-based low cost charges and perceive how they work together with the remainder of the steadiness sheet.
Think about a 45-year previous pharmaceutical scientist with a base wage of $200,000, adjusted annually for inflation, who receives $100,000 nominal restricted inventory models with a five-year vesting schedule who additionally expects to obtain roughly $25,000 per yr from social safety beginning at age 65. One may mannequin this particular person’s human capital as almost 2/3rds long-duration-inflation-adjusted company bonds with a length similar to the 20 years of money flows, and almost 1/3rd mid-cap shares (reflecting the scale of the corporate).
You might refine the 1/3rd mid-cap shares by modeling them based mostly on the pharmaceutical sector and even utilizing the particular inventory in query. The present internet current worth of social safety isn’t value that a lot at this time, but it surely too must be accounted for correctly. The anticipated returns on every type the idea for a weighted common price of capital for calculating the worth of the scientist’s human capital.
The capitalized worth of the investor’s nondiscretionary consumption legal responsibility, which is considerably like issuing a long-duration-inflation-linked bond with outgoing coupon funds, is included as a nontradable damaging holding within the optimization.
Then within the presence of nontradable belongings and liabilities NWO determines the optimum asset allocation for the investor’s tradable belongings — an optimization that absolutely accounts for the investor’s capacity to tackle threat.
Transferring via time life occurs. The consumer could possibly be fired, the worth of inventory may go up/down, inflation may improve/lower, begin a household, or an uninsured house on the coast could possibly be washed away, and so on. Critically, as the worth of the particular person’s belongings relative to the worth of liabilities evolves, the particular person’s monetary well being and talent to tackle threat evolve. In contrast to asset-only MVO, NWO absolutely captures the investor’s capacity to tackle threat.
In a February 2025 Monetary Planning Assessment article, “Internet Value Optimization,” Kaplan and I focus on greater than 8,000 internet value optimizations by which we various the investor’s human capital and the composition of the investor’s financial steadiness sheet. As Determine 1 reveals, after controlling for the investor’s threat tolerance, the quantity of fairness publicity for tradable monetary belongings elevated with the relative power of the investor’s financial steadiness sheet. We imagine it is a new, however intuitive end result.
Determine 1: Optimum Monetary Capital Fairness Degree.
Supply: Idzorek and Kaplan (2025).
In Determine 1, every dot is the typical fairness stage of economic capital from 180 internet value optimizations similar to completely different combos of human capital and threat tolerance. Because the holistic financial steadiness sheet strengthens, all else equal, it’s optimum to tackle extra threat.
Conundrum Solved
With NWO there is no such thing as a conundrum. We not must ask which is extra essential, the consumer’s perspective towards threat or the consumer’s capability to tackle threat.
NWO means that you can use the consumer’s threat tolerance because it was supposed — to mirror the consumer’s perspective towards threat. Most significantly, NWO concurrently goes properly past the time horizon proxy of threat capability by absolutely reflecting the consumer’s capacity to tackle threat as captured by a holistic and evolving financial steadiness sheet.
With the development of internet value optimization, the monetary planning business ought to transfer from MVO to NWO.
References
Idzorek, Thomas M., and Paul D. Kaplan. 2024. Lifetime Monetary Recommendation: A Personalised Optimum Multi-Degree Method. Charlottesville, VA: Analysis Basis of CFA Institute. https://rpc.cfainstitute.org/websites/default/information/-/media/paperwork/article/rf-brief/lifetime-financial-advice.pdf
Idzorek, Thomas M., and Paul D. Kaplan. 2025. “Internet Value Optimization.” Monetary Planning Assessment 8 (1): e1200. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cfp2.1200
Straehl, Philip U., Robert ten Brincke, and Carlos Gutierrez Mangas. 2024. “Ought to Your Inventory Portfolio Take into account Your Profession?” Morningstar Analysis Paper, June 21.
Wilcox, Jarrod W. 2003. “Harry Markowitz and the Discretionary Wealth Speculation.” Journal of Portfolio Administration 29 (3): 58 – 65. DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2003.319884
Wilcox, Jarrod W., and Frank J. Fabozzi. 2009. “A Discretionary Wealth Method for Funding Coverage.” Journal of Portfolio Administration 36 (1): 46-59. DOI: 10.3905/JPM.2009.36.1.046
Wilcox, Jarrod W., Jeffrey E. Horvitz, and Dan DiBartolomeo. 2006. Funding Administration for Taxable Non-public Traders. Charlottesville, VA: Analysis Basis of CFA Institute.
[1] Examples embody Wilcox (2003), Wilcox, Horvitz, and di Bartolomeo (2006), and Wilcox and Fabozzi (2009).
