Apple denies violating US court docket order in Epic Video games lawsuit By Reuters


By Mike Scarcella

(Reuters) – IPhone maker Apple on Friday denied violating a court docket order governing its App Retailer and urged a California federal decide to reject a request by “Fortnite” developer Epic Video games to carry it in contempt.

Apple made the arguments in a submitting to U.S. District Choose Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers (NYSE:) in Oakland, who presided over Epic’s lawsuit in 2020 accusing Apple of violating antitrust legislation with its tight controls over how shoppers obtain apps and pay for transactions inside them.

The Apple submitting criticized what it referred to as an try by Epic to make Apple’s “instruments and applied sciences out there to builders free of charge.”

Epic, it stated, wished the court docket “to micromanage Apple’s enterprise operations in a approach that may improve Epic’s profitability.”

Epic declined to remark. Apple didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark in regards to the dispute, a part of an extended battle between the 2 firms.

Epic largely misplaced its case in opposition to Apple, however Rogers in 2021 ordered Apple to present builders better freedom to information app customers to different fee strategies for digital items.

The U.S. Supreme Courtroom in January declined to listen to Apple’s enchantment of the injunction order.

Epic stated in a court docket submitting final month that Cupertino, California-based Apple was in “blatant violation” of the court docket’s injunction. It pointed to Apple’s imposition of a 27% price on builders for some purchases, which the online game maker stated makes hyperlinks for different fee choices “commercially unusable.”

Epic additionally alleged Apple barred some apps from informing customers about different methods to pay for items.

Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:), Microsoft (NASDAQ:), Elon Musk’s X and Match Group (NASDAQ:) final month echoed Epic’s arguments, telling Rogers that Apple was in “clear violation” of the court docket’s order.

In an identical case that Epic introduced in opposition to Alphabet (NASDAQ:)’s Google, a decide in San Francisco is predicted this 12 months to problem a separate injunction affecting the Google Play Retailer.

The case is Epic Video games Inc v Apple Inc (NASDAQ:), U.S. District Courtroom, Northern District of California, No. 20-05640.





Source link

Related articles

Microsoft formally ends assist for Home windows 10, which runs on ~40% of Home windows PCs per Statcounter; customers can enroll in an Prolonged...

Andrew Cunningham / Ars Technica: Microsoft formally ends assist for Home windows 10, which runs on ~40% of Home windows PCs per Statcounter; customers can enroll in an Prolonged Safety Updates program  — ...

NYC Mayor Indicators EO Establishing Digital Belongings and Blockchain Workplace

New York Metropolis Mayor Eric Adams introduced the institution of a municipal digital belongings and blockchain workplace in a bid to cement his crypto agenda within the last months of his time period....

Wells Fargo Earnings Present Momentum in Wealth and Funding Administration

Wells Fargo & Firm has reported its monetary outcomes for the third quarter of 2025, showcasing a sturdy efficiency that exceeded market expectations. The corporate continues to construct on its strategic priorities, making...

10 Dangerous Excessive Dividend Shares To Promote

Printed on October 14th, 2025 by Bob Ciura Dividend shares are naturally interesting for earnings traders, however not all dividend shares are buys. Earnings traders typically need to keep away from dividend cuts every time...

The China perspective on the commerce battle

Excessive danger warning: Overseas trade buying and selling carries a excessive stage of danger that will not...
spot_img

Latest articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com