When Bubbles Go Bust – Investment Watch


by jessefelder 

While the decline in the broad stock market over the first half of this year has led many to believe the current bear market is just that old, it may be important to note that many of the most popular stocks in the market peaked and rolled over well before the major indexes did. In fact, it was the meme stock blowoff top back in February of 2021, nearly a year before the peak in the broad market, that marked the beginning of the bear market for many. And this sequence should be familiar to those of us who were involved in markets a couple of decades ago.

Back in early March of 2000, the Nasdaq put in a blow off top of its own, similar to that in seen in the Goldman Sachs Non-Profitable Tech Index in February of 2021 (both indexed to 100 in the chart below). Much like the broader market today, the other major indexes didn’t follow the lead of the Nasdaq until several months later. In fact, the NYSE Composite even went on to make a new high in September of 2000, much like the major indexes did late last year. In both cases, the failure of the most speculative stocks in the market to confirm those later highs served as a clear warning sign for risk appetites in a broader sense.

 

What is perhaps most striking about the comparison in the chart above is the fact that in the 16 months’ runup to its final peak the Goldman Sachs Non-Profitable Tech Index significantly outperformed the Nasdaq 100 Index in the final blowoff stage of its own bubble: a 450% gain in the former versus 300% in the latter. Of course it’s not an apples-to-apples comparison (Goldman’s index doesn’t go back that far) but, after witnessing the first bubble in real time, it’s also not something I thought I would ever see again let alone something I would see surpassed in such dramatic fashion.

It’s also interesting to note the correlation between the two price patterns (at 0.87)  is very high which just goes to show that when bubbles burst, there is a fairly predictable pattern they follow. And if that earlier history of the Nasdaq during the Dotcom Bubble is to remain a valid guide, there is still a great deal of potential downside ahead even after the carnage we have seen in the speculative favorites so far. How do you lose 90%? You lose 50% and then you lose 50% again… and then you lose 50% once more. The current cycle has now seen the first two halvings. The final one could be still ahead.





Help Support Independent Media, Please Donate or Subscribe:

Trending:

Views:
64



Source link

Related articles

Oshkosh: Sturdy Purchase Improve Regardless of Execution Challenges (NYSE:OSK)

This text was written byComply withDhierin-Perkash Bechai is an aerospace, protection and airline analyst. Dhierin runs the investing group The Aerospace Discussion board, whose aim is to find funding alternatives within the aerospace,...

Eni, Repsol think about promoting stakes in Venezuela’s Perla gasoline area

(Bloomberg) -- Eni SpA and Repsol SA are contemplating bringing in exterior buyers into the enormous Perla pure gasoline area off Venezuela’s coast, because the Trump administration pushes to unlock the South American...

A profile of Meta Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang, who’s the corporate’s first senior govt from Gen Z and has succeeded in constructing hype...

Featured Podcasts Lenny's Podcast: OpenAI's Head of ChatGPT: We're getting into a brand new period of AI (once more) | Tibo Sottiaux Interviews with world-class product leaders and progress consultants to uncover actionable recommendation that can...

Kiyosaki Sees Bitcoin as A part of a Broader ‘Monetary Prepper’ Guess

Key TakeawaysRobert Kiyosaki compares monetary preparation to carrying automotive insurance coverage.He favors bitcoin, gold, and silver over government-issued cash.His oil-well holdings add an earnings part to his preparation. Robert Kiyosaki Compares Bitcoin Possession...

OpenAI security chief quits, warning AI firm’s tradition is ‘damaged’ | OpenAI

A security chief at OpenAI has give up the corporate, warning that its tradition was damaged and that AI companies weren't “being practically cautious sufficient” about creating the know-how.David Robinson, who led the...
spot_img

Latest articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com