As outlined contribution (DC) plans proceed to evolve, plan sponsors face growing complexity in managing retirement advantages. With $12.5 trillion in property (3Q 2024) and accounting for one-third of all US retirement property, DC plans carry important duty for guaranteeing sturdy monetary outcomes for individuals1. In 2025, plan sponsors should deal with optimizing funding methods, decreasing prices, and enhancing participant schooling to enhance retirement readiness.
The highest priorities for DC plans in 2025 embody crucial areas similar to goal date fund choice, payment transparency, funding lineup analysis, and staying forward of regulatory and litigation tendencies.
Concentrating on Goal Date Funds (TDFs)
The Division of Labor’s steerage, Goal Date Retirement Funds — Ideas for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries, outlines greatest practices for TDF choice2. Key takeaways embody:
- Establishing a course of for choosing and evaluating TDFs and for periodic assessment
- Understanding the TDFs’ underlying investments and the glidepath
- Reviewing the TDFs’ charges and funding bills
- Making the most of all accessible info within the assessment and decision-making course of
- Documenting the method
- Growing efficient worker communications.
Implicit on this steerage are three key factors to contemplate. First, as with all funding course of, it is very important perceive the aim of the investments is to assist your distinctive group of workers make investments for retirement. Second, analyze the traits of the workforce by amassing workforce demographics, funding behavioral tendencies — generally present in studies produced by the recordkeeper — and different workforce knowledge. Lastly, set up the plan sponsor’s targets for the plan and general funding beliefs that can function a information when evaluating numerous TDFs. Making prudent funding choices requires these components to drive the evaluation and determine TDFs which can be appropriate to your workforce.
Understanding Funding Charges and Share Lessons
We regularly see conditions the place the plan sponsor goes by means of the trouble of discovering an incredible funding technique after which selects a less-than-optimal funding car.
For instance, a plan sponsor or its advisor would possibly choose a mutual fund share class for which the expense ratio consists of revenue-share {dollars}, that are paid to the advisor or collected by the recordkeeper to credit score towards its charges, slightly than utilizing a zero-revenue share class. In different circumstances, a plan could be eligible (meet the minimal funding threshold) for a collective funding belief (CIT) car with a decrease expense ratio than the mutual fund model(s) of the funding technique. Typically, these selections or oversights lead to plan individuals paying greater funding charges and recordkeeper charges than if the plan sponsor had optimized the selection of funding car.
We advise plan sponsors take into account the impression on individuals of their present mutual fund share courses, if not zero income, and whether or not the plan qualifies for similar CIT technique. We suggest plan sponsors use zero-revenue share courses of mutual funds or collective funding trusts, as relevant, as they supply higher payment transparency and infrequently decrease general charges, all else equal, than plans using revenue-sharing share courses.
Evaluating Funding Lineup Construction
Most committees’ routine funding critiques observe an analogous format: a have a look at the economic system and capital markets adopted by a assessment of the efficiency and threat metrics of the funding menu. If there are funds on watch or in want of alternative, modifications are mentioned. Whereas routine critiques of plan fiduciaries are anticipated, we advise supplementing with a periodic assessment of the funding lineup construction, that means funding classes (Determine 1) and whether or not they’re carried out with lively administration or passive administration. We advise such a assessment no less than each three years or earlier if workforce demographics change in a significant manner.
Determine 1: Common Funding Construction.
In Determine 1, we present a generic funding lineup construction. To guage the appropriateness of the lineup construction, plan sponsors ought to begin by plotting the present funding menu utilizing the columns proven. This visualization can facilitate dialogue about whether or not the present construction is acceptable or whether or not funding classes ought to be altered. Elements for the dialogue may embody participant group funding information, age, demographics, and extent of retiree inhabitants within the plan.
Providing Complete Monetary Schooling Assets
In our 2024 Monetary Wellness within the Office Examine, workers reported spending no less than three hours per week worrying about private funds, with 68% stating that monetary stress negatively impacts their psychological well being. And three out of 4 employers acknowledged that staff’ monetary stress negatively impacts office operations3.
We’ve got seen firsthand how monetary wellness advantages may help workers enhance their monetary well being and scale back these challenges. Whereas conventional group conferences have traditionally performed a big function — significantly for workforces the place a big proportion of the inhabitants will not be at a desk – there’s a significant improve within the variety of plan sponsors and their workers on the lookout for individualized one-on-one conferences with monetary educators. These personal conferences allow workers to have candid conversations about their distinctive monetary challenges.
Inspecting Committee Construction and Duties
Employment tendencies from “the nice resignation” to “the massive keep” and “the nice reshuffling” illustrate the mobility of as we speak’s workforce. These modifications additionally negatively impression an organization’s retirement plan committee. Causes would possibly fluctuate from altering positions to leaving the corporate or retirement.
Committees ought to get again to the fundamentals in 2025 by doing the next:
- Doc the committee construction and duties
- Construct an onboarding schooling guidelines for brand spanking new committee members
- Preserve a calendar construction for fiduciary persevering with schooling
- Affirm the fiduciary file is updated, together with the funding coverage assertion, govt summaries, and funding reporting
Monitoring Developments in Litigation and Regulation
With important provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Acts expiring on the finish of 2025, there may be the potential for brand spanking new tax laws. Adjustments to tax-advantaged retirement packages can include tax laws, so will probably be vital for plan sponsors to remain present on potential modifications.
From a litigation standpoint, two main tendencies formed 2024: plan charges and utilization of forfeiture property.
Plan charges stay a perennial focus. Has the committee fulfilled its fiduciary responsibility to watch plan bills in order that they’re cheap for the providers supplied? It is very important observe that this matter covers each vendor bills, similar to recordkeeping and advisor bills, and funding administration bills, similar to alternative of funding supervisor or the share class utilized.
The present wave of litigation concerning utilization of forfeiture property is a brand new phenomenon. The litigation has centered on whether or not plan sponsors are permitted to make use of forfeiture property to scale back employer contributions, or if they’re restricted to paying permissible vendor bills or distributing the funds to participant accounts.
With the potential for change and continued uptick in litigation, plan sponsors ought to collaborate with their advisors to remain on high of those and different tendencies in regulation and litigation in 2025.
Plan sponsors play a pivotal function in shaping the monetary way forward for tens of millions of workers. By prioritizing funding optimization, price effectivity, governance, and participant schooling, they will improve retirement outcomes and scale back fiduciary dangers. As market situations, workforce demographics, and regulatory landscapes evolve, steady evaluation and strategic decision-making shall be key to making sure DC plans stay efficient, aggressive, and aligned with participant wants. By specializing in these six priorities, plan sponsors can drive significant impression in 2025 and past.
Disclosures
The fabric introduced herein is of a normal nature and doesn’t represent the availability by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any individual, or a suggestion to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed reliable. Such info will not be assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to vary with out discover.
The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising and marketing identify PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the assorted discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated providers supplied by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions performed by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation until, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax providers settlement. PNC Financial institution will not be registered as a municipal advisor underneath the Dodd-Frank Wall Avenue Reform and Shopper Safety Act.
“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Might Lose Worth. ©2025 The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
